GB 18587-2001 Grade A: What China's Carpet Emission Standard Covers
TL;DR
GB 18587-2001 is a mandatory Chinese national standard for limits, test methods and inspection rules covering harmful-substance emissions from carpets, carpet cushions and adhesives. A Grade A reference is not, by itself, proof that a particular UNIJOY product has a current result, certificate or project approval. Match the exact product, sample, report and standard status before relying on it.

What GB 18587-2001 actually covers
GB 18587-2001 is a mandatory Chinese national standard for limits, test methods and inspection rules covering harmful-substance emissions from carpets, carpet cushions and adhesives. A Grade A reference is not, by itself, proof that a particular UNIJOY product has a current result, certificate or project approval. Match the exact product, sample, report and standard status before relying on it.
This guide is for procurement, compliance, specifiers and project technicians who need an auditable evidence trail. It explains what the standard can answer and what still needs a separate document.
Start with the official record, not a supplier slogan. SAMR records GB 18587-2001 as a mandatory standard issued on 10 December 2001 and effective from 1 January 2002. The same record now identifies GB 18586-2026 as the replacement, so the applicable edition and transition position must be checked for the procurement date.
A field-by-field evidence check
| Field to check | Direct answer | Evidence boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Document scope | Carpets, carpet cushions and adhesives; emission limits, methods and inspection rules. | It does not identify a UNIJOY model or establish every product property. |
| Grade A | A category used by the original standard text for an environmental-friendly product; confirm the exact clause and edition. | The word A alone is not a certificate, batch result or current product declaration. |
| Product identity | Exact series, style/code, construction, colourway and sample reference. | A collection name, catalogue photograph or generic backing name is not enough. |
| Test evidence | Report number, laboratory, method, specimen, date and result linked to the product. | A standard citation without a matched report does not prove a result. |
| Current status | Official standard record and any applicable replacement or transition notice. | Do not assume an old report answers a current legal or project requirement. |

Marketing language and evidence boundaries
Use the official technical-document route to request the current file set, then contact the UNIJOY technical team with the exact catalogue code and project question. Keep the request focused on evidence rather than a broad environmental promise.
| Marketing wording | Ask for | Do not infer |
|---|---|---|
| “Grade A carpet” | The original GB 18587 text or a traceable certificate stating the category, scope and product identity. | It does not automatically prove fire, wear, acoustic, dimensional or project performance. |
| “Low emission” or “healthy” | The named standard, test method, specimen, result, laboratory and report date. | It does not establish every VOC, TVOC or indoor-air requirement outside that evidence. |
| “Complies with GB 18587” | A current report or certificate that names the exact product and applicable edition. | It does not prove the statement applies to every colour, backing, batch or installation. |
| “Certified” | The issuing body, certificate number, scope, validity and verification route. | A supplier declaration is not the same as independent certification. |
Compare this boundary with the Green Label Plus certificate guide, the carpet tile EPD guide and the QBT 2755 guide. Their scopes are different.

A supplier request you can file
Use the official technical-document route to request the current file set, then contact the UNIJOY technical team with the exact catalogue code and project question. Keep the request focused on evidence rather than a broad environmental promise.
- Exact product series, style/code, colourway and sample reference
- GB 18587-2001 or replacement edition named in the document
- Test method, laboratory, report number, specimen and test date
- Grade/category wording quoted with its clause and certificate scope
- Certificate validity, issuer and verification route, if a certificate is claimed
- Separate evidence requests for fire, wear, acoustics, dimensions and project suitability
Frequently asked questions
Does GB 18587-2001 prove that a UNIJOY product is low-VOC?
No. It defines a document scope and test framework. A buyer still needs a current report or certificate matched to the exact product, sample, method and scope; this guide does not claim a UNIJOY result.
Is Grade A the same as a certificate?
No. Grade A wording must be read in the relevant standard text or certificate with its clause, product identity and scope. The label alone is not independent evidence.
What should a buyer request from a supplier?
Request the exact product code and sample reference, applicable standard edition, test method, laboratory, report number, test date, result, certificate scope and validity where a certificate is claimed.
Does this standard prove fire, wear or acoustic performance?
No. An emission document does not automatically prove fire, wear, dimensional stability, acoustics or project suitability. Those claims require their own applicable evidence.
Sources & further reading
- SAMR — GB 18587-2001 official standard record (issued 2001-12-10; effective 2002-01-01; current-status record accessed 2026-08-14)
- SAMR — GB 18586-2026 replacement record (accessed 2026-08-14)
- National Digital Library of Standards — GB 18587-2001 scope record (accessed 2026-08-14)
- GB 18587-2001 reference text reproduction — Grade A/B wording and tables (accessed 2026-08-14; secondary copy, not a UNIJOY product file)
- Carpet and Rug Institute — Green Label Plus testing protocol (separate emissions programme; accessed 2026-08-14)
- UNIJOY technical documents
Figures attributed to other manufacturers are their own published values, quoted for context. Different laboratories, sample build-ups and substrates are not directly comparable.



