Carpet Tile Acoustics: What NRC 0.25 and ΔLw 28 dB Actually Mean for an Office

TL;DR

Independent SGS testing of UNIJOY nylon loop-pile carpet tile with PVC/PET backing (500×500×9 mm) measured a Noise Reduction Coefficient of NRC 0.25 to ISO 354:2003 and an impact sound improvement of ΔLw 28 dB to ISO 10140-3:2021. The absorption is not flat: it peaks at 0.48 at 500 Hz and stays between 0.24 and 0.43 from 800 Hz to 5 kHz — the band that carries human speech — while absorption below 250 Hz is close to zero. Impact improvement rises with frequency, from about 3 dB at 100 Hz to 56 dB at 1250 Hz. Practically: carpet tile is highly effective against footfall noise for the floor below and useful against speech-range reverberation in the room itself, but it does almost nothing for low-frequency rumble and is not a substitute for ceiling absorption or partition sealing.

Open-plan office with grey patterned modular carpet tile, glass curtain wall and hard ceiling — the reflective surfaces that make floor absorption matter

1. Two metrics that get confused

Almost every noise complaint in a commercial building is one of two problems, and flooring is asked to solve both. They are not the same problem, they are not measured the same way, and a product can be strong at one and ordinary at the other.

 Sound absorptionImpact sound insulation
The complaintThis room echoes, I can hear every conversationI can hear footsteps and chairs from the floor above
Who benefitsPeople in the same roomPeople in the room below
MetricNRC / αsΔLw (improvement), Ln,w (residual)
Test standardISO 354:2003, reverberation roomISO 10140-3:2021, tapping machine
UNIJOY measuredNRC 0.25 (ᾱs 0.23)ΔLw 28 dB (Ln,w 48 dB)
Scale0 to 1; higher absorbs moredB improvement; higher is better

Both figures come from the same sample: tufted nylon loop pile on PVC/PET backing, 500 × 500 × 9 mm, surface density about 3.68 kg/m², tested by SGS in March 2026. The report numbers are listed in the sources at the end so an acoustic consultant can request the originals.

Corridor and lounge with textured grey carpet tile, plaster walls and a slatted metal ceiling
Both problems live in the same space. For the people walking through, the hard plaster walls and ceiling decide how much the corridor rings; for whoever sits under this slab, every footstep is the complaint. The floor covering is the one surface that acts on both.

2. The absorption curve, frequency by frequency

Absorption happens at the surface. Sound energy entering the pile is scattered between the fibres and converted to a very small amount of heat instead of being reflected back into the room, which is why the density and structure of the face matter more than the thickness of the tile.

Close-up of UNIJOY nylon loop pile carpet tile surface showing dense, closed yarn loops
The tested sample is a tufted nylon loop pile. Closed loops packed at high density give the porous, fibrous surface that does the absorbing — and the same construction is what resists crushing under office traffic.

NRC is a single number averaged from four octave bands (250, 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz). It is convenient and it hides almost everything interesting. Here is the full one-third-octave curve from the ISO 354 test.

speech range 500–2000 Hz0.00.10.20.30.40.51002505001k2k5k0.480.430.00absorption coefficient αsfrequency (Hz)
Figure 1 — Sound absorption coefficient of UNIJOY nylon carpet tile by frequency. Measured to ISO 354:2003, report CZIN2603000210CM01_EN.s (100–5000 Hz) = 0.23, NRC = 0.25.

Two things stand out, and neither is visible in the NRC number.

The peak sits at 500 Hz. Absorption jumps from 0.19 at 400 Hz to 0.48 at 500 Hz, then settles into a broad plateau between 0.24 and 0.43 across the rest of the measured range. That band — roughly 500 Hz to 4 kHz — is where the intelligible content of human speech lives. In an open-plan office the problem is rarely raw loudness; it is that you can make out the words of a conversation three desks away, which is what pulls attention away from focused work. A floor that absorbs most in the speech band is doing the useful part of the job even at a modest overall NRC.

Below 250 Hz the floor does essentially nothing. The coefficient reads 0.02 at 100 Hz and 0.00 at 125 Hz. Low-frequency energy — HVAC rumble, lift machinery, traffic through a facade — passes straight through a 9 mm textile layer. If that is the complaint on site, carpet is not the remedy and no carpet specification will change it.

3. Impact sound: ΔLw 28 dB in context

Impact sound is measured by dropping a standardised tapping machine on the floor and recording the level in the room below, first on the bare slab and then with the covering in place. The difference, weighted into a single number, is ΔLw.

0153045601002505001k1.25k2.8 dB37.355.6 dBimprovement ΔL (dB)frequency (Hz)
Figure 2 — Impact sound improvement by frequency, bare slab versus the same slab with UNIJOY carpet tile. Measured to ISO 10140-3:2021, report CZIN2603000210CM02_EN. Weighted single figure ΔLw = 28 dB; residual Ln,w = 48 dB.

The curve climbs steeply: about 2.8 dB of improvement at 100 Hz, 16.8 dB at 250 Hz, 37.3 dB at 500 Hz and 55.6 dB at 1250 Hz. The pattern matches the absorption result — a soft, porous layer is progressively more effective as wavelengths get shorter — and it maps well onto the noise people actually complain about. The sharp, clicking part of a footstep or a rolling chair caster is mid-to-high frequency energy, and that is exactly where this covering removes the most.

For scale: a change of roughly 10 dB is perceived as a halving of loudness. A weighted improvement of 28 dB is therefore a very large subjective reduction in footfall noise for the space below, which is why carpet remains the default specification for upper floors in offices, hotels and multi-tenant buildings.

Office reception and lounge with carpet tile running through the circulation route to a stair core
Impact noise is generated wherever people walk, and circulation routes generate the most of it. Carrying the covering continuously through lobbies, corridors and stair approaches — rather than stopping it at the workspace — is what keeps footfall out of the floor below.
Floor coveringImpact sound improvementSource of figure
Bare concrete slabreference (0 dB)definition of the test
Hard surface flooring, typical1–6 dBInterface, published range
4.5 mm LVT with acoustic backing16 dBInterface, published figure
4 mm acoustic rubber flooringΔLw 20 dBnora, published figure
UNIJOY nylon carpet tile, 9 mmΔLw 28 dBSGS CZIN2603000210CM02_EN

These figures come from different laboratories, sample build-ups and slab constructions, so they indicate the general standing of each material family rather than a controlled head-to-head comparison. Textile floor coverings are expected to lead on impact sound; that is a property of soft, porous materials, not a claim about any one manufacturer.

4. How to specify acoustics properly

Most acoustic disappointments trace back to a specification that named a number without naming the conditions that produce it. This is the sequence that avoids that.

1Name thecomplaint2Pick themetric3Set atarget4Get the fullreport5Match thebuild-upecho, or thefloor below?NRC, orΔL w?with yourconsultantlab, number,standard, curvebacking andsize must match
Figure 3 — Specifying flooring acoustics without inheriting someone elses test conditions.

Step 5 is the one most often skipped. An acoustic result belongs to a specific build-up. A figure measured on a 9 mm tile with PVC/PET backing does not transfer to the same pattern supplied on a different backing, and a result measured on a bare slab does not transfer to a raised access floor, which has its own cavity behaviour. When a substitution is proposed late in a project, the acoustic report has to be re-checked along with the price.

5. What carpet tile cannot do

Being straight about the boundaries is more useful than a page of superlatives, and it is the part of the conversation an acoustic consultant will have anyway.

Meeting room with slatted timber acoustic ceiling above carpet tile and full-height glazing
A worked example of the layering. The slatted timber ceiling carries the bulk of the absorption, the carpet handles footfall and the speech-range reflections off the floor, and the full-height glazing is the surface neither of them can help with. Specifying the floor alone would leave most of this room untreated.
  • It will not fix low-frequency noise. Measured absorption is 0.02 at 100 Hz. Plant rumble, lift motors and traffic ingress need mass, isolation or source treatment.
  • It will not replace ceiling absorption. Dedicated acoustic ceiling products reach NRC 0.9 and above, and a ceiling faces the whole room. A floor at NRC 0.25 is a useful base layer, not the main event.
  • It will not stop speech travelling between rooms. That is airborne transmission through partitions, doors and the ceiling void, and it is solved by sealing and mass, not by the floor finish.
  • It will not compensate for an open plan with no screens. Absorption reduces reflected energy; it does nothing to the direct sound path between two people with clear line of sight.

Where carpet tile is genuinely hard to beat is impact noise for the floor below, and broadband absorption in the speech range across a very large surface area at a cost per square metre that no dedicated acoustic product matches.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good NRC for carpet tile?

Commercial carpet tile generally falls between NRC 0.15 and 0.35, so an NRC of 0.25 sits in the middle of the normal range. Values far above that usually indicate a thick cushion backing or an underlay, not the tile alone. Treat any NRC quoted without a test standard and report number as unverified.

What is the difference between NRC and ΔLw?

NRC describes sound absorption — how much sound the floor stops reflecting back into the room you are standing in. ΔLw describes impact sound improvement — how much footfall and chair-scrape noise is stopped from reaching the room below. They are measured by different standards (ISO 354 and ISO 10140-3) and solve different complaints.

Does carpet tile reduce noise between floors?

It substantially reduces impact noise transmitted downward. UNIJOY tile measured ΔLw 28 dB, and because roughly 10 dB is perceived as a halving of loudness, that is a large reduction in footfall noise for the tenant below. It does far less for airborne sound such as speech or music travelling through the structure, which is governed by the slab and the partitions.

Is thicker carpet always quieter?

Not reliably. Absorption depends on fibre density, pile structure and backing porosity, not thickness alone, and a dense low-pile loop can outperform a thicker cut pile. Thickness also has trade-offs elsewhere: in transport hubs and heavy-traffic areas, thick pile makes wheeled loads harder to move and crushes faster.

Will carpet tile fix an echoing open-plan office on its own?

No. A floor is one surface out of six, and it is the surface people stand on rather than the one most sound reflects off. Carpet tile is best treated as the base layer of an acoustic strategy that also includes ceiling absorption, screens between desk banks, and sealed meeting rooms.

What test documents should I ask a supplier for?

Ask for the full test report, not a summary line in a brochure. It should name the issuing laboratory, a report number, the test standard and edition, the sample construction and dimensions, and the frequency-by-frequency results. A single number with no traceable report behind it cannot be verified by your acoustic consultant.

Sources & further reading

  1. ISO 354:2003 — Acoustics: Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room
  2. ISO 10140-3:2021 — Laboratory measurement of impact sound insulation
  3. CRI Technical Bulletin — Acoustical Characteristics of Carpet
  4. Interface — Acoustics in flooring (published product figures)
  5. Carpet Institute of Australia — Acoustic benefits of carpet
  6. UNIJOY — Sound Absorption Coefficient test report (SGS CZIN2603000210CM01_EN)
  7. UNIJOY — Impact Sound Insulation test report (SGS CZIN2603000210CM02_EN)

Figures attributed to other manufacturers are their own published values, quoted for context. Different laboratories, sample build-ups and substrates are not directly comparable.